Pakistan from Indian Lens: Continual Non-acceptance

Written By: Prof. Dr. Riaz Ahmed

Despite the fact that Pakistan was established on August 14, 1947 as a result of understanding reached between Quaid-i-Azam, Gandhi, Nehru, Baldev Singh, Lord Mountbatten and others on June 3, 1947, India has never accepted Pakistan from the core of its heart. Seventy years have passed, yet the Indian leaders, who have been at the helm of affairs, believe that a time will come when Pakistan will be no more on the world map. They have been encouraged in this regard from the events of 1971 when the East Pakistan was converted to Bangladesh because of follies of Pakistani rulers and Indian machinations. Indian rulers want to repeat the same story in case of the present Pakistan. Keeping in view the long historical background of the present Pakistan, this is their misconception. It would be better for the Indian government and the intellectuals to understand the realities of Pakistan, otherwise, they will be living in a fool’s paradise. They do not understand that the Pakistanis of the Indus region are of different type of people who are maintaining their traditions, history, culture and heritage for more than five thousand years. Their attitude of life, and on life, is different from what the Indians believe. The Indian governments also believe that Pakistanis are actually the Indians, which, as a matter of fact, is not the case. For the last two thousand years, the Pakistanis have always been a martial race who ruled or dominated many parts of present India or Hindustan. That is why the Muslim historians always divided India into two regions – Hind and Sindh. The present structure of Pakistan and Hindustan is a creation perfectly according to the perception of Muslim historians and Muslim rulers for the last one thousand years.

Pakistan is the cradle of old Indus Valley Civilization. The Aryans came here during 2000-1500 BC settled by pushing the Dravidians southward. This is the land which provided atmosphere to the third Aryan generation to compile first Hindu religious book – Rig Veda followed by other three books of the Hindu religion in the areas of the present Hindustan regions. This is the land where Alexander the Great came and left his long lasting influences. It was from here that these influences spread to various regions of Hindustan. Gandhara civilization is another milestone of the history of Pakistan. This is the land which accepted political Islam immediately after its rise in the Arabian Peninsula. This is the land where Sultan Mahmud of Ghazni (997-1030) established his great empire which included the present countries of Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran, and four present Central Asian countries. The old Gandhara civilization merged into the Ghaznavid civilization which provided special bent to the Muslim civilization. This is the land where the Muslim culture and civilization flourished under the Ghaznavid rulers for about two hundred years (997-1192) with its Persian flavor in the Central Asian direction. This is the land wherefrom Sultan Shahabuddin Ghori extended the Muslim rule to the whole of Northern India in 1192 up to present day Bangladesh. This is the land which provided base to Sultan Qutbuddin Aibak, first Sultan of Delhi during 1206-1210 to establish his rule from his base of Lahore. This is the land wherefrom the Delhi ruling dynasties – Khaljis, Tughlaqs, Afghans, and lastly the Mughals – emerged to dominate Delhi and the whole of India. These are the facts which the present rulers of India should understand and extend their hand of friendship towards Pakistan which genuinely believes in building good relations with India. India should stop the bickering which it is doing both internally and externally to destabilize Pakistan. Otherwise, the Indians would be in trouble if they do not understand the arguments of logic, culture, civilization and facts of history.

What the Indians are doing presently is not a new thing. The founders of modern India like M.K. Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, and others have also been doing the same despite the fact that Quaid-i-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah, founder of Pakistan, made them realize a number of times about the genuine feelings of the majority Muslims of the subcontinent, especially with reference to areas of the present Pakistan. But all these efforts went in vain. In this article some of the facts twisting and misleading the attitude of Gandhi during the Pakistan Movement and while dealing with Jinnah have been pointed out. These are the facts which should open the eyes of the intellectuals and writers of modern Pakistan and India.

In this direction, first instance was witnessed after when the All India Muslim League was able to organize biggest Muslim Conference at Lucknow on October 15-17, 1937 in which not only the Muslim League leaders but the Chief Ministers of all the majority Muslim provinces of the Punjab, Bengal, Assam, Sindh also participated and entered into contract with Jinnah that from henceforth the whole of Muslim India would be one against the coming Hindu Raj. Leaders from NWFP (KP) were also present in this session. By this biggest gathering of the Muslims, Gandhi, Nehru and other Hindu leaders felt threatened. Gandhi and Nehru, feeling themselves as the God Fathers of Hindu India, entered into dialogue with Jinnah in order to get explanation as to why the Muslim League was going on this drive of a separate path. Gandhi’s dialogues and correspondence was the most misleading and was against many facts. In his effort to befool Jinnah, Gandhi tried to give twisted assurances to Jinnah, but Jinnah could not be deviated from his path. As a matter of fact, Gandhi had felt antagonized by Jinnah’s address at the Lucknow session of AIML of October 1937 which he, in his letter of October 19, 1937 described as “a declaration of war”, but which Jinnah, in his reply to Gandhi on November 5, 1937 called “purely self defence”.1 Gandhi also cajoled him that “it is the cry of a friend not of an opponent”.2 This was another effort to sidetrack Jinnah from the path of saving the Muslims’ future. Describing his acquaintance with Jinnah since Gandhi’s return from South Africa in 1915 when Jinnah welcomed him, Gandhi tried to twist the facts. In this way Gandhi expected that Jinnah should have blind faith in Gandhi and should not worry about the Muslims' future in India. But Jinnah was the leader who could not be befooled by Gandhi.

Next effort was when at the start of Second World War (1939-1945) in September 1939, Jinnah started his drive of terming the Congress Raj in the six Hindu majority provinces as the Hindu Raj, Gandhi vainly tried to plead to Jinnah that the things were not as such. Jinnah, in a number of research reports, prepared by the independent observers and the Muslim League leaders, established that Congress rule, as a matter of fact, was a Hindu Raj, leading their resignations in November 1939. When Indian National Congress under Gandhi tried to give twist to the facts projected by Jinnah by starting a non-violent movement, Jinnah managed to arrange “Day of Deliverance” on December 22, 1939 in which not only the Muslims but Sikhs, Christians, Scheduled Caste Hindus and other minorities equally participated. Jinnah’s viewpoint was also proved by the British Government. In November 1939 a hectic debate took place on the alarming situation in British India in the House of Lords in which a number of members of the House of Lords participated. Giving the policy statement in this connection Lord Zetland, the Secretary of State for India, explained that in terms of its political behavior the Indian National Congress functioned as if it was a “Hindu organization”. Thus it were not only the Muslim League or other smaller parties representing various minorities which termed the Congress as a Hindu body, but the British Government also termed it as such. Mahatma Gandhi took a strong note of this and said that he was shocked at Lord Zetland’s statement by which the Congress was termed as a Hindu organization. Gandhi expressed his amazedness about these expressions emanating from responsible position of the Secretary of State.3 Thus the Muslim viewpoint was substantiated by the British Government in the British Parliament. By observing the “Day of Deliverance,” history was put on a different path, which led to road to Pakistan.

There is a long list of misleading efforts by Gandhi, especially since March 23, 1940 when the Pakistan Resolution was passed at Lahore by the All India Muslim League under Jinnah’s guidance and leadership. Hindu press, wrongly led by Gandhi, tried to mislead the Muslim people which was not allowed by Jinnah and his colleagues at the All India Muslim League. There are a number of instances in this regard with reference to Cripps Offer 1942, Gandhi-Jinnah Talks 1944, Simla Conference 1945, Cabinet Mission proposals, and others.

I will content myself only to the last days of the transfer of power. Even when under the June 3, 1947 Partition Plan, the things were settled how to establish Pakistan in August 1947, Gandhi chose a different way to mislead and misrepresent the Muslim case of Pakistan. On June 7, 1947 Lord Ismay submitted his note to Lord Mountbatten in which he conveyed results of his talk with Gandhi last night.4 Ismay felt that these suggestions of Gandhi were “different” from what Mountbatten had previously thought of them.5 Gandhi had suggested to the Viceroy that the latter should “speak to Mr. Jinnah in the following sense” on these four issues: 1) Referendum in the KP (NWFP) should be abandoned because of forthcoming bloodshed; 2) Provincial government of Dr. Khan Sahib should not be dismissed; 3) Action on the June 3 Plan should be suspended; and 4) New tri-partite agreement between Congress, Muslim League and the British Government should be concluded by replacing the Partition Plan.

This plea of Gandhi, as a matter of fact, was a deviation from what has already been accepted under the June 3 Plan of Mountbatten which required sincere and honest implementation. The purpose of Gandhi’s new suggestion was to confuse the issues and to avoid the referendum in the NWFP because the Khan Sahib's Ministry was not ready to hold the referendum on account of the emergence of pro-Pakistan popular sentiments in the province. Instead of accepting the popular verdict of the people of NWFP, the Congress wanted to postpone or resort to different recourse so that some time could be gained until the pro-Pakistan sentiments subsided. Gandhi also encouraged Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan to float his idea of a Pathan state.

Mountbatten wanted to proceed by the Partition Plan of June 3 in an honest way, but Gandhi was demanding that this Partition Plan should not be fairly implemented, because, according to him, in politics fairness does not exist. For this purpose Gandhi wrote letter to Mountbatten on June 27/28, 1947 and complained that it was a “mistake” on the part of Mountbatten that he treated the Congress and League on equal basis in settling the June 3 Plan.6 Gandhi even charged: “I pointed the initial mistake of the British being party to splitting India into two.”7

All these suggestions were dismissed by Jinnah and the British Government. By implementing the Partition Plan in most of the manners, Pakistan was established on August 14, 1947.

Gandhi has passed away. But his policy of not accepting Pakistan from the core of the Indian heart is continuing. The present Indian leaders and intellectuals, and historians are advised to come forward and accept the reality of Pakistan so that good relations between the two countries are built up, so that the cause of peace in the region is well served. If the Indian governments do not realize their misconception and do not accept the fact of Pakistan as a reality, the region as a whole will remain affected.


The writer is Ex-Director, National Institute of Historical and Cultural Research, and Professor at Quaid-i-Azam Chair (NIPS), Quaid-i-Azam University Islamabad.

Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.


1 Times of India, June 16, 1938.
2 Indian Annual Register Jan-June 1938, p. 360.
3 Indian Annual Register 1939, Vo. II, pp. 38-39.
4 Transfer of Power, Vol. XI, p. 285.
5 Transfer of Power, Vol. XI, p. 285.
6 Proceedings of Viceroy’s 16th Miscellaneous Meeting, Thursday, June 5, 1947 in MSS. Eur. Mountbatten Papers, F. 200/106, British Library (OIOC), London.
7 Times of India, June 28, 1947.

Read 357 times

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated. HTML code is not allowed.

Follow Us On Twitter